Tag Archives: FCC

Deep Dive into National Broadband Plan.

FCC To Think Over Its Authority
Congress has been able to get an initial look at the FCC’s broadband plan, the House Subcommittee on Communications this week is going to examine how it addresses the “broadband availability gap.”
This Thursday’s “The National Broadband Plan: Deploying Quality Broadband Services to the Last Mile” hearing is one of many the subcommittee will hold to review specific elements of the plan. This week the focus will center on chapters 4, 6 and 8 that relate to the broadband plan’s availability provisions.
The subcommittee will talk with the FCC about how the broadband plan addresses what effect universal service, pole attachments and rights of way, municipal networks, speed and price and competition policy issues have on expanding broadband services to “underserved” and “unserved” communities.

Congress has been able to get an initial look at the FCC’s broadband plan, the House Subcommittee on Communications this week is going to examine how it addresses the “broadband availability gap.”
This Thursday’s “The National Broadband Plan: Deploying Quality Broadband Services to the Last Mile” hearing is one of many the subcommittee will hold to review specific elements of the plan. This week the focus will center on chapters 4, 6 and 8 that relate to the broadband plan’s availability provisions.
The subcommittee will talk with the FCC about how the broadband plan addresses what effect universal service, pole attachments and rights of way, municipal networks, speed and price and competition policy issues have on expanding broadband services to “underserved” and “unserved” communities.

Broadcasting & Cable: House To Drill Down Into Broadband Plan.

Comcast wins. But we could all lose. Comcast over FCC!

Court Says FCC Doesn’t Have the Power to Enforce Net Neutrality!

A federal appeals court just ruled on Comcast’s lawsuit to get the FCC’s p2p blocking ban overturned—that the FCC doesn’t have the power to tell Comcast, or any ISP, to be net neutral.

The National Cable and Telecommunications Association is shitting themselves with glee, meantime:

“The Court correctly ruled that a specific order by the previous FCC was wrong. We cannot state strongly enough that this decision will change nothing about the cable industry’s longstanding commitment to provide consumers the best possible broadband experience. Nor does the ruling alter the government’s current ability to protect consumers. We continue to embrace a free and open Internet as the right policy and will continue to work with the Commission and other policymakers and stakeholders to find a sound way of preserving that goal.”

Case Study

Court rules FCC can’t tell Comcast how to manageWeb traffic

  • 2004

Feb. 8: Then-FCC Chairman Michael Powell introduces a set of consumer protections—dubbed the ‘Four Freedoms’—that Internet providers should follow.

  • 2007

Oct: Reports surface that Comcast is interfering with consumers’ ability to download files from file-sharing services like BitTorrent.

  • 2008

Jan: FCC opens investigation.

March: Comcast says it will change its network-management practices and stop slowing peer-to-peer Internet traffic.

Aug: FCC says Comcast violated its Internet principles. It orders the company to change its policies but doesn’t fine Comcast.

Sept: Comcast appeals, saying the FCC’s net-neutrality principles aren’t enforceable.

  • 2009

Sept: FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski proposes formal net neutrality rules, which would also apply to wireless Internet providers.

  • 2010

April: U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit strikes down FCC’s Comcast order, saying that the agency exceeded its authority.

Source: Wall Street Journal.

Sprint, Clearwire among companies asking for TD-LTE standard in WiMAX spectrum.

Clearwire now appears to be taking a very active role in developing an LTE-based standard that could supplant WiMAX in its 2.6GHz spectrum should the need arise. Along with Motorola, Huawei, ZTE, Cisco, Nokia Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent, and — surprise, surprise — Clearwire partner Sprint, the company is asking the 3GPP to define a standard for running TD-LTE in the 2.6GHz slot. Unlike the more commonly-used FD-LTE — the standard Verizon is using, among others — TD-LTE operates unpaired, meaning it can operate in slimmer chunks of spectrum than its counterpart. Asking for a standard is clearly a far cry from actually building out a network, but it’s interesting to note that Clearwire and Sprint alike both have their eyes firmly fixed on an LTE-based technology if the WiMAX industry packs it in.

Mobile Business Briefing: Report: Industry giants back US TD-LTE move.

The FCC is trying to turn part of Wireless Spectrum into free internet service.

the FCC wants to dedicate a chunk of the wireless spectrum to providing free internet service.

The FCC plans to make its recommendation under the National Broadband Plan set for release next week, which has the goal of making broadband more affordable for everyone in America.

Of course, they didn’t, you know, say how they were going to do such a thing. And they’re going to have to claw that spectrum out of the cold, dead hands of telecom lobbyists. But you know what? Good for them for actually worrying about what people would benefit from instead of what gigantic telecoms want.

Reuters: U.S. considers some free wireless broadband service.

National Broadband Plan Previewed.

The Federal Communications Commission will seek to bring Internet speeds of 1 gigabit per second by 2020 to community institutions such as schools and government buildings, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said on Thursday.

Genachowski said the blueprint will set “dramatic, bold” goals to bring faster Internet speeds to American homes, including 100 megabits per second (Mbps) for 100 million U.S. households by 2020.

But Karl Bode of Broadband Reports is skeptical, while analyst Dave Burnstein says the plan accomplishes very little for affordability, quality, speed, or availability of broadband in the U.S.

Blair Levin, chief author of the National Broadband Plan yesterday defended it against recent attacks that it is overly broad, ambitious and unfeasible, reports Computer World. The final version is set for release March 17.

While the plan is not finalized, various specific pieces of it have been released by FCC officials in recent days, including one that asks TV broadcasters to voluntarily provide airwaves for wireless broadband. Broadcasters (who never paid the government a dime for their frequencies), would share profits gained from broadband use.

In the real world, money talks. The 90 MHz of AWS frequencies raised close to $14 Billion in 2006, while the 52 Mhz of 700MHz spectrum brought in almost $20 Billion for the Treasury, in 2008.

The FCC’s Broadband Plan also calls on Congress to spend up to $16 billion to create radio interoperability among emergency responders and suggests that another $9 billion be spent to extend fast Internet connections to rural areas.

Levin suggested the plan would make broadband Internet service eligible for the Universal Service Fund program. It now focuses on voice telecommunications. He also said the plan will require that Internet service providers offer specific minimum Internet speeds to be eligible for USF monies.

Net neutrality provisions will not be a part of the Broadband Plan, according to Levin, because of a separate FCC Open Internet Initiative. In turn, any legislative recommendations on net neutrality from the Open Internet Initiative will probably be considered by Congress in the Internet Freedom Preservation legislation and related bills.

“A 100 meg is just a dream,” Qwest Chief Executive Edward Mueller told Reuters. “We don’t think the customer wants that.”

Of course 100 Mbps (mobile) and 1 Gbps (fixed) isthe very definition of “4G” by the ITU.

WiMAX 2.0 (due for commercial implementation next year) and LTE Advanced (arriving sometime later), are defined as delivering 100 Mbps (mobile) and 1 Gbps (fixed).

It sounds like a bold initiative on the part of the FCC. But Clearwire already expects to cover 120 million homes in the United States by the end of this year. They’ll move towards WiMAX 2.0 beginning in 2011. The upgrade can deliver up to 120 Mbps out of the box. Beceem’s new BCS500 4G chip supports WiMAX 16e and 16m as well as LTE, while Samsung has operational 802.16m basestations.

Perhaps WiMAX 2.0, which promises a fixed 1 Gbps service, would deliver an effective 100 Mbps (at home) while 100 Mbps (mobile) might deliver an effective 20 Mbps service. That’s about four times the speed of today’s WiMax system and what WiMAX 2 aims to deliver. They’ve got the bandwidth to do it.

The tricky bit is bringing slow moving (but politically powerful) cellular operators up to speed. It’s all about spectrum. If you need three, 20 MHz sectors, that might require some 60 MHz per tower. That’s a total of 180 MHz for three wireless carriers. The UHF band might supply a lot of that bandwidth, especially if broadcasters were moved to VHF Channel 2-13. Not many cities can support more than 10 over-the-air broadcast stations. Unlicensed use of “white spaces” might utilize unused frequencies.

Currently group owners splatter the airwaves on UHF Channels 14 (470-476 Mhz) through Channel 51 (692-698 Mhz). That’s over 200 MHz. Recall that the 50 MHz auctioned from the upper 700MHz band in 2008 brought in nearly $20 Billion. That seems to indicate that 200 Mhz of UHF spectrum would be worth around $80 Billion.

If cellular operators’ complaints about spectrum shortage are to be believed, then an auction of all UHF spectrum could be a windfall that cannot be ignored…by this or any government. And while were at it, why not provide 1 Mbps to every citizen…at no charge. It should be a right of all citizens in the global village. Like clean air. Like tv.

Reuters: Federal Communications Commission will seek to bring Internet speeds of 1 gigabit per second by 2020
Broadband.gov: National Broadband Plan.
Computer World: FCC broadband czar defends national plan.